• home
  • posts
  • rebels vs the empire why real life is like star wars
  • Posted October 11th, 2015

    Rebels vs the Empire: why real life is like Star Wars

    Rebels vs the Empire: why real life is like Star Wars

    My brother is not politically or philosophically motivated, not particularly well read, and doesn’t keep up with current affairs. Most people are like that. Let’s call them ‘the mainstream’, if that’s not disrespectful. I don’t think it is – he’s my brother, after all. But he’s a huge Star Wars fan, and when we talk about politics, he says ‘yes, it’s like Star Wars – the Jedi versus the Dark Side, the rebels versus the Empire, and the Empire is winning’.

    Empire, rebels and the mainstream

    Empire: If the above means nothing to you, see here.

    Rebels: There are many people who might consider themselves rebels in this system – permaculturists, transitioners, craftspeople, smallholders, communards, co-operators, renewable energy enthusasts, nature-lovers, hackers, natural builders, downshifters, cyclists, hippies, various flavours of anarchists, distributists, independent business-owners, open-sourcers, occupiers, jam-makers, WWOOFers, campaigners, greens, socialists, libertarians, communists, real-ale-lovers, community organisers, dropouts, survivalists, punks, rastafarians, distributists, occupiers, trades unionists, vegans, bakers, organic farmers and so on; you get the idea – lots of us. There’s a lot of overlap (many people are in more than one group), but precious little coordination (see below).

    Mainstream: my brother’s guess is that about 80% of the population is mainstream, the rest being pro-Empire or rebels.

    He’s a rebel sympathiser, but not a rebel. He asks what he can possibly do, and it’s difficult to give a good answer. He doesn’t have too much time to think about it – he needs to make enough money to pay the mortgage, pay bills and put food on the table. He has no rebel contacts and nothing to join. There are small things that he can do, and if millions of people do them, they’ll turn into big things – but not enough to really challenge the Empire. I often mistake people for rebels, when really they just ‘get it’. But most people are rebel sympathisers – they’re nice people who want to do the right thing if possible. If we get something moving they won’t try to stop it, and they’ll even join in, as long as their family is safe and they’re still reasonably comfortable.

    He lives with a big dog to protect himself from some people in his community, as do many others. This is an Empire mentality – everyone for themselves, there is no such thing as society. He can’t use small shops when they’ve been closed by a giant Tesco that dominates the view from his garden. A rebel victory would involve much more closely-knit communities, getting together to organise, play, work and exchange.


    Why overcoming the Empire will be difficult

    • The Empire is organised hierarchically, but the rebels are organised horizontally, in a network. The Empire hierarchy is directed from the top in command-and-control style, and brooks no dissent – dissenters lose their jobs

    • The ‘rebel network’ is uncoordinated, so doesn’t present a strong challenge to the Empire yet

    • The Empire owns our media (including social media), and so they are able to distract people from the fact that there is an Empire, or to accept it as inevitable

    • All our essentials of life are controlled by the Empire – our financial system, our political system, most of our food, energy, land and housing, and very importantly, jobs. In fact, most of the mainstream has been persuaded that the only way to provide jobs and all our essentials is via the Empire

    • There is no means to keep independent businesses independent (apart from co-operativising them)

    • Even then there are occasional disasters (the Co-op Bank was consumed by the Empire)

    • The Empire owns the arms industry, and control governments who in turn control the military. Ultimately, they have the means to retain power with force if necessary

    Grounds for optimism

    • There are more rebels than Empire people, because the imperial hierarchy contains fewer people the higher you get

    • Most people are rebel sympathisers, as long as their safety is guaranteed. The mainstream will follow whoever leads, and in fact, given the choice, almost all of them would choose the rebels – as long as they don’t have to do anything too strenuous

    • The rebels are learning how to provide the essentials of life, and draw customers away from the Empire with community-owned, co-operative, independent and peer-to-peer enterprises (as well as open source)

    • The lower ranks of the Empire are not so committed, and require various kinds of bribery; very few people who work for the Empire are committed to the ideals of the Empire – they do it for money

    • Because of this lack of commitment, the lower ranks of the Empire, including (and very importantly) police and soldiers, can easily be recruited

    • The rebel network can spread indefinitely, without diluting commitment

    • The rebels have the best people – i.e. they score higher than Empire people in terms of intelligence, integrity and compassion. Those are not qualities you require (apart from a certain type of cunning) to climb the Empire hierarchy


    Coordinating the rebel network

    The fact that the rebels are a network and the Empire is a hierarchy is the reason we’re losing. It’s very hard to fight a hierarchy with a network. A network is the ideal end point for the whole of society, but it’s hard to get there because command and control is much more efficient. I’m not saying that we need a hierarchy to fight a hierarchy, just that we need to be more coordinated. It’s even difficult to know what ‘we’ means, when parts of the network don’t know that other parts exist. Maybe we need a map.

    A network can splinter and fight amongst themselves (which is exactly what’s happening) in ways that a hierarchy can’t. In my travels I’ve noticed vitriol between greens and socialists, urban activits and rural communards, anarchists and independent business owners – much more vitriol, in fact, than for the Empire. Again, this is a bound to happen in a loose network, in ways that are impossible in a rigid hierarchy. But if we’re all working to provide alternatives to the Empire for people to spend their money and get their wages, as well as challenging the Empire’s dominance in terms of propaganda and decision-making, we could and should overlook small differences to work towards a society that the Empire can’t control – we can argue about everything else later.

    It’s up to rebel ‘cheerleaders’ like Lowimpact.org to get the mainstream consuming those essentials mentioned above from independent, co-operative, community owned, peer-to-peer and open sources, including DIY. Growing your own veg, brewing your own beer, installing solar panels – even cycling – are rebel acts. They are small ways to take back the provision of life’s essentials from the Empire.

    It’s essential that we win, and change our economic system, because ifs fixation on growth is constantly damaging nature. If we don’t stop, at some point, nature won’t support us any more, and we’ll be removed. There are plenty of rebels who don’t understand the need to stabilise the economy. I’m happy to work with them to take power from the Empire. I just hope they get the importance of a stable economy before the biosphere degrades too much more – see here.


    Finally, I think that support is there for the rebels if they coordinate and start to move society in a different direction. That hasn’t started to happen yet. The Empire’s grip on my brother’s town – a typical town – is getting tighter every year. If we rebels (and if you’ve read this far, you’re probably a rebel) can develop plans to turn this tide, we won’t get much resistance from the mainstream. It’s not happening yet though, and those rebels who think it is are suffering from complacency. We need to coordinate our actions without turning the network into a hierarchy, which would produce just another empire.

    Lowimpact.org is a resource for rebels. 200+ topics, a blog to broadcast and debate on, a network to find people and advertise on, and a forum to ask specific questions. We’re set to grow; we’ve risen about a million places in the web rankings in the last year, and we’re about to launch in other countries.

    The views expressed in our blog are those of the author and not necessarily lowimpact.org's


    • 1John Harrison October 11th, 2015

      It’s great to see how this site is developing and growing. What I like is that we are able to differ in a civilised manner – so often political discussion devolves into aggressive name calling on the net. Of course the Empire is gripping tighter and tighter – it’s their nature. Your site demonstrates that the war is far from lost and we’ve still hope of something better.

    • 2Dave Darby October 11th, 2015

      I hope you’re right John. There are lots of great things happening, but nothing yet that really challenges the Empire. We need coordinated action to achieve that. I tried to avoid warlike analogies, because I firmly believe (although others don’t), that coordinated action needs to be non-violent, or we risk replacing one empire with another. We do need organisation and discipline though. You’re right about the aggressive name-calling – and it’s usually different rebel ‘factions’ that are being aggressive with each other. Totally counterproductive and undisciplined, and playing right into the hands of the Empire. We have to be able to communicate reasonably to work out what we’re going to do, otherwise we’re going to remain splintered and the future will remain ‘imperial’ right up until the time that the biosphere won’t support us any more.

    • 3Dani Austin October 12th, 2015

      Just adore the Star Wars analogy (big fan).

      It’s a great way to explain the rebel sympathisers. I wonder though whether significant change or “rebellion” would cause a little bit of discomfort for rebel sympathisers, or perceived discomfort such as having less scope to buy lots of material possessions, less travel overseas etc?

    • 4Dave Darby October 12th, 2015

      Hi Dani,

      Not nearly as much discomfort than we’re going to have unless we do something. But I think they might be happy with the new sense of community – i.e. safer, friendlier, better jobs than shelf-stacking or telesales for the Empire etc.

      Yes, I liked the Star Wars analogy as well. Tried it on various (generally unresponsive) people who said it was the best way they’d heard me describe the situation, and got it completely. Unfortunately though, judging by likes and shares, it’s not a popular approach.

    • 5Andrew Rollinson October 12th, 2015

      I recently went to Scandinavia for a Gasification convention. A man there was telling the group that his parents refused to let him watch Star Wars because it was too Capitalist. It was a pleasant surprise for me to hear, but all the other Scandinavians were just nodding in agreement, as if it was common.

      I like Scandinavia, and the people’s outlook on life.



    Leave a comment

    We welcome questions.

    There’s a crash coming – a slap from Mother Nature. This isn’t pessimistic; it’s realistic.

    The human impact on nature and on each other is accelerating and needs systemic change to reverse.

    We’re not advocating poverty, or a hair-shirt existence. We advocate changes that will mean better lives for almost everyone.

    Facebook icon Twitter icon Youtube icon

    All rights reserved © lowimpact 2023