• home
  • info articles
  • garrett hardin vs elinor ostrom
  • Garrett Hardin vs Elinor Ostrom

    Garret Hardin became infamous for promulgating his view of commons as ‘a tragedy’. Elinor Ostrom’s painstaking research shows him to be unhelpfully mistaken in his perception.

    In 1968, Garrett Hardin published an essay The Tragedy of the Commons, where claimed (in neoliberal fashion) that commons were doomed to be destroyed because all users will ‘rationally’ want to graze one more cow, take more than they previously did.

    Elinor Ostrom won a Nobel Prize in 2009 by showing that Hardin was not describing a commons, but something that is unmanaged – actually an unregulated common pool.

    Hardin in his ideology just saw the resource and its ‘unowned’ status, and not the community and the de facto governance that organised actual practice. Ostrom exposed the very frequent presence and effectiveness, in actual life, of these latter.

    There’s a crash coming – a slap from Mother Nature. This isn’t pessimistic; it’s realistic.

    The human impact on nature and on each other is accelerating and needs systemic change to reverse.

    We’re not advocating poverty, or a hair-shirt existence. We advocate changes that will mean better lives for almost everyone.

    Latest Comments

    Stay up to date

    Newsletter sign up is temporarily disabled

    Facebook icon Twitter icon

    All rights reserved © lowimpact 2022