“The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is the one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.” – J K Galbraith
What is low-impact money?
This is a complicated topic, so to understand the answer to that question, first we have to define money. What you’ll often read is that money functions as:
- a means of exchange – a way of buying and selling;
- a store of value – money as wealth;
- a unit of value – a way to show how much something is worth.
But that’s what money does, not what it is. Most people probably imagine coins or notes if they’re asked to think of what money is. But money is really a huge system, of which coins and notes are only a tiny, superficial part.
Money could be described as something transferable that can give us access to things we want.
History of money
Many economics textbooks still claim that money evolved from barter – but it’s not true. There’s never been a society in which barter was the means of exchange (it’s too difficult to find someone who wants what you have and has what you want).
Money appeared in many forms at various times in different parts of the world; but here are three important ways that money originated.
Tax tokens: this was a way of building empires stretching back to ancient times. A king stamps his head on coins, pays soldiers with them and demands them as taxes, so that all subjects have to provide goods and services to the soldiers and to the king, to obtain the coins. More…
Goldsmith’s receipts: goldsmiths kept valuables in their store-rooms and provided receipts that could then be passed around as, in effect, money – because everyone knew the receipts were good for real gold or jewels. Goldsmiths saw that people didn’t often come to collect their valuables, so started lending money backed by gold in their vaults. They eventually realised that they could lend out more than they actually had, and became fabulously wealthy. This is the basis of ‘fractional reserve’ banking – i.e. they only had a fraction of what they lent in reserve in their vaults. More...
‘Common tender’: this can include traders’ market money, or informal mutual credit. Imagine a medieval village in which everyone is a producer and a consumer, and knows everyone else, but no-one has any money. Everyone manages to obtain the services of thatchers, carpenters, farmers, fishermen, blacksmiths, bakers, brewers, cheesemakers, weavers, leatherworkers, basketmakers etc. because everyone keeps a tally in their head (or maybe in a more formal way), of what’s been provided to the community (including by you). If anyone is lazy or unreliable, people won’t want to provide things for them, and so everyone plays the game, and they all get what they need. More…
In 1694 the Bank of England was founded, which brought together the state and private issuance of money (the first two examples above). The state gave monopoly control of the money supply to banks, the entire economy was monetised, and common tender was squeezed out. Since then, all countries have formed central banks, and the state-bank partnership has come to dominate everywhere.
Here’s our ‘brief history of money‘.
Where does money come from now?
Most people probably believe that the state creates money. That’s true for about 3% of money – coins, notes and central bank reserves. The other 97% is created by banks when they make loans. If you borrow £10k from a bank, they haven’t taken that money from anywhere else. They’ve just created it from nothing and deposited it in your account. More…
It’s not even a ‘fractional reserve’ system any more, in that that no portion of the money banks lend out needs to be held in reserve anywhere. Their decisions are solely based on confidence that the loans will be repaid (with interest). This is proven by Richard Werner and confirmed by the Bank of England.
A flaw in the monetary system? Excellent video that explains how the money system, and compound interest, funnel money from the majority to a super-wealthy elite.
… is money that’s created and controlled by us, not by banks. Originator of LETSystems, Michael Linton said: ‘we all use their money, and it always goes away’. Where does it go away to? To tax havens and the accounts of the majority shareholders of giant corporations. We can only prevent this if the money we use is not the kind of money that can be sucked out of communities and delivered to tax havens. For that to be the case, it’s important that our means of exchange is not also a store of value. Truly low-impact money would be used to trade within communities, but it wouldn’t be possible to extract it and store it away.
Let’s talk more about the benefits of this type of money, and then explore the various types of non-bank-created money.
What are the benefits of low-impact money?
Well, nothing we do to try to move to a sustainable, healthy and democratic society will work as long as we have the current money system, because money has those two conflicting functions – i.e. it can be used to buy and sell things, and it can be used to store, hoard, accumulate and become wealthy with. As long as that’s the case, money will gravitate towards stored wealth, because money attracts money and gives access to the political system. This continues until so much money is concentrated, and so little is circulating that the economy crashes – as it has many times – and will continue to do so until those two functions are separated. During crashes, communities are devastated and ordinary people suffer. During booms, nature is destroyed. So there’s never a ‘good’ part of the ‘boom-and-bust’ business cycle.
It’s important to understand the difference between a commodity-based economy and a money-based economy. In a commodity-based economy, people do useful work, for which they receive some means of exchange, which they use to purchase the results of other people doing useful work. In a money-based economy, people with money invest in the production of commodities, which they sell in order to make more money. They don’t produce anything, and they have no interest in the commodities produced – they’re only interested in the money they can accumulate.
10-year-old girl explains to her teddy where money comes from. I’m not sure he believes her – but she’s right. More introductory videos from Positive Money here.
Low-impact money, as a means of exchange, is useful only in a commodity-based economy. Here are some advantages of this kind of economy:
- it doesn’t require perpetual GDP growth (which damages ecology)
- it doesn’t concentrate wealth in very few hands (which prevents democracy)
- it prevents the means of exchange from being sucked out of communities and stored (which reduces community resilience and well-being)
- it doesn’t require interest, banks or bailouts
- if the means of exchange is generated within communities themselves, it solves the scarcity of money / poverty problem and protects communities from wider economic crashes
What can I do?
As mentioned, it’s a complicated subject, so there’s a lot to learn. Here are a few sources we recommend:
- David Graeber’s Debt: the first 5000 years
- Tom Greco’s The End of Money and the Future of Civilisation
- Matthew Slater and Jem Bendell’s Money and Society MOOC
- Felix Martin’s Money: an Unauthorised Biography
- Glyn Davies’ History of Money (pdf)
- Brett Scott’s Altered States of Monetary Consciousness
- Positive Money’s video series
The goldsmith’s tale – an ‘origin of money’ story.
However, this still involves using conventional money. Some support conventional money if it’s backed by gold, or if it’s issued by the state rather than banks. But why dig gold out of the ground (in environmentally-damaging and exploitative ways), just to bury it again in bank vaults, where it has to be guarded, and some people can still hoard it all? And state control doesn’t change the money monopoly, it just puts it under new management (and not that new, really, when bank CEOs are recruited as US Treasury Secretaries).
No – we can take control of money ourselves. So the next step is to try some alternatives, like:
Local currencies: not conventional money, and they stay in local communities longer than conventional money; but they have to be bought with conventional money, and so don’t represent a real separation from bank-issued, debt-based money.
Cryptocurrencies: represent a real separation from the banks; but they come with problems of their own – a) Bitcoin requires huge and growing amounts of electricity (crypto enthusiasts will tell you that there are new coins that don’t require much electricity at all – but most crypto activity is still Bitcoin); b) it’s mostly used for speculation, not trade; c) they don’t separate the exchange and store of value functions – you can still become a Bitcoin billionaire. But at least they show that we can have a money system without banks.
Credit clearing and Mutual credit: genuinely do separate the means of exchange and store of value functions. They’re reviving the informal networks of medieval villages, but with the internet, a looming scarcity of conventional money, and the software to federate local groups up to the global level. Clearing / mutual credit networks exist in many parts of the world, including Colombia, Kenya, Australia and Italy. Now Mutual Credit Services are helping to build local mutual credit groups in the UK, and the Credit Commons protocol can connect all these groups together, anywhere in the world, so that they can intertrade.
As Henry Kissinger said: ‘Who controls money controls the world’. So unless we’re happy with a financial elite controlling the world, we have to control it ourselves.
The specialist(s) below will respond to queries on this topic. Please comment in the box at the bottom of the page.
Brett Scott is an author, journalist and financial hacker who wrote the Heretic’s Guide to Global Finance, has produced reports for the United Nations and articles for the Guardian, New Scientist, Wired and more. He blogs at Altered States of Monetary Consciousness.
Matthew Slater develops software for complementary currencies. He co-founded Community Forge, which free hosts software for collaborative credit schemes; he co-authored the Money & Society MOOC, a free masters level multidisciplinary online course. He co-drafted the Credit Commons white paper, a proposal for a global solidarity economy money system, based on mutual credit principles.
The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily lowimpact.org's
1Arnold Bomans July 27th, 2021
This is a wonderful source of information and I am ashamed that I was not aware of it, not even of ‘The End of Money and the Future of Civilisation,’ when I designed a moneyless economy. I coined it ‘Eranism’ and hope that it will foster cooperation and reduce needless activities which are harmful to people and Nature. In this economy, people estimate common and individual needs, set themselves to work, and register each other’s labour time. Finally, they go to the shop and obtain what they announced to be needing (or a fair ration if there is not enough.) This economy is designed so that ‘misreporting’ is not profitable (so-called strategyproofness.)
I should remain silent until I have digested all information on this site but as civilisation risks to be rapidly approaching its end, I feel urged to ask the following:
Who would be willing to test this moneyless economy, together with a few other people, by using a spreadsheet alone? For money?
The testers would have to imagine the aforementioned needs and labour times. Registration in the spreadsheet can become somewhat cumbersome, but it can also be fun to try to outsmart the economy. (Actually, it is a game in the mathematical sense but it has not been developed as a board game where a die is cast and a card is drawn for the next job or need.) The spreadsheet is available at
where also details and contact information can be found. If all goes well, then a recommendation may help initiate further research, a real-life test, and development of a computer application to replace the spreadsheets.